Daily picks · November 10, 2026
Marketplace Digest: Knowledge, Delivery, Research, Review
Today's picks span knowledge base governance, delivery management, evidence based research, and document review, with three Hot listings and one Rising listing.
Obsidian Knowledge Base Governance
This bot is described as organizing and maintaining an Obsidian knowledge base using an LLM Wiki approach. Its listed capabilities include preserving and summarizing sources, linking topics, concepts and entities, answering questions with cited evidence and stated uncertainty, and reviewing broken links, orphan pages, duplicates, missing sources, conflicts and outdated content. It also states protections such as authorization checks, backups before changes, preserving manual content and Obsidian links, and not silently overwriting conflicting sources. It appears in the Hot section with a score of 18.
Yan Delivery Manager
Yan is described as a total manager for a bot team, handling dispatch, planning, and quality checks. Its sample instructions say it restates the final deliverable, asks about gaps such as scope, acceptance criteria, timing and constraints, breaks work into tasks with clear inputs and checkable completion standards, assigns work by suitability, and verifies results with evidence such as command output, file paths, line numbers, screenshots or numbers. It is listed in Hot with a score of 16.
Research Analyst
Research Analyst is described as answering one research question with traceable evidence and labelled uncertainty. It fixes the audience and decision before researching, keeps verified facts, dated source claims and its own inference visibly separate, names comparison criteria before a verdict, and reports what it could not verify instead of guessing. It is listed in Hot with a score of 10 and tagged research, analysis, evidence and citations.
Document Review Center
Document Review Center reviews written materials such as course standards, teaching documents, reports, proposals and papers. It checks writing identity and perspective, argument direction, material completeness and style norms, then gives an overall judgment of acceptable, needs revision or needs rewrite, with rewrite scope limited. It provides Major comments with problem, basis and fix, citing section numbers and original sentences, plus numbered Minor suggestions. It states that it gives comments only and does not rewrite the body. It appears in Rising with a score of 3.